Natural Gas Sampling

The necessity to be able to take a representative sample of the hydrocarbon product known as natural gas is to ensure proper accounting for transactions and efficient product processing.  The various sampling methods that are available and the most widely known options and limitations of these methods are discussed here.  The appropriate equipment to use and the reasons for their use and correct installation of the equipment are also addressed.

In the last 30 years, the natural gas pipeline industry has transitioned from the supplier of clean, dry natural gas to the mover of billable gas energy; clean and dry or dirty and wet.    The amount of hydrocarbon product that is transported between producer, processor, distributor and user is significant.  To be able to verify the exact composition of the product is important from an economic and product treatment standpoint.  In addition, if the best sampling procedures are followed, the potential for disputes between supplier and customer will be greatly reduced.  The importance of properly determining hydrocarbon gas composition benefits all parties involved and will achieve greater significance as this resource becomes more expensive and plays a larger role in our energy needs worldwide.

API 14.1/GPA-2166 defines a representative sample as………. “Compositionally identical or as near to identical as possible, to the sample source stream”  And, from ISO-10715, a representative sample is defined as, “A sample having the same composition as the material sampled, when the latter is considered as a homogeneous whole.” These standards are the most common referenced on Gas Sampling procedures, along with the AGA Gas Measurement Manual, which is currently under revision.

Proper sampling is fundamental to the correct determination of the product composition.  Most current Gas Chromatographs boast an accuracy level of ½ of a BTU, but that should not be the comfort zone for the measurement department.  A faulty sampling method or improperly installed and maintained equipment may alter the BTU content of the flowing stream by 25+ BTU.  While the accuracy of the GC may be considered as a given, the properly executed technique for taking the sample is certainly not a given.   The level of interest in effective and accurate gas sampling techniques is currently at a very high priority within the natural gas industry.  With current natural gas prices, exploration interests, profitability, deregulation and consolidation of the work force, recoverable revenue must be found and reported.  At large volume delivery points, a 3-5 BTU error in energy determination can cost companies tens of thousands of dollars within a very short time period.  Accurate sampling techniques must be implemented with equal interest as that which is given to accurate volume measurement.

In a majority of cases, the sample that is taken is also the source for the determination of the specific gravity of the gas.  This figure is a critical component of the flow formula, from which we derive the product quantity.  An error in sampling effects both quality and quantity, and ultimately, profitability.  Most flow equations receive the specific gravity portion of the formula from the analysis of the gas sample.  If the analysis is deprived of the total picture, how can the volumetric answers be relied upon as representative of the total system?  The error is compounded, and the integrity of the system is compromised.

In the past 45 years, sampling systems have been refined to meet more exacting requirements of the industry and sampling standards have been revised to reflect the latest reliable knowledge and techniques.  The equipment available today is truly “state of the art.”  Samplers, cylinders, probe regulators, protective filtration systems, separators, membranes, protective shut-in devices for analyzers, insulated and heated enclosures and the like are available from a number of known manufacturers. 

Natural Gas sampling has been performed for years with techniques handed down from generation to generation.  Most of the early methods were not sufficient to meet today's requirements of accuracy and repeatability; however, standards have been developed to reach toward these demands.  The most widely known standards are API 14.1/GPA-2166 (2022). ISO-10715 (2022) is also a well-known standard.  Work continues to be sponsored on activities related to API 14.1/GPA-2166.  It is important that the technician refer to the latest versions of these standards. They are updated for a reason --  IMPROVEMENT!  Currently, there is much interest in Hydrocarbon Wet Gas Sampling and a Working Group in API CPMA has been formed to address that.  An initial report was published in 2024 and available from API - API TECHNICAL REPORT 2581, FIRST EDITION, MAY 2024

Proper maintenance of all sampling equipment is vital to the operations of all sampling methods.  A review of relative sampling standards and the manufacturer’s operation, installation and maintenance manuals, is an important step in the total accuracy of the sampling process.  Dirty or poorly maintained sampling apparatus will adversely affect the final results and profitability of the gas company’s operation.

Measurement technicians or personnel, who will be responsible for physically taking the spot samples, should be fully aware of the importance of their task.  They should be knowledgeable of the proper methods, procedures and techniques involved in spot sampling.  Periodic training and being updated on revised standards is an important part of their job.  Proper performance of their job will have a financial impact on the profits of the company.

Sampling can be accomplished by primarily three techniques: spot sampling, continuous composite sampling or continuous on-line sampling systems.  The various components of a sampling system deserve individual consideration, before the various sampling procedures are investigated.  All components should be compatible with the fluid being sampled.

Probes  –  The correct placement is at the top of the pipe, into the center one third or at least 200 mm (8 inches) for larger diameter pipes.  The probe should be placed in an area of minimum turbulence, that is, away from headers, bends, valves, etc.  Turbulence will stir up the contaminates that usually reside at the bottom of the pipeline and are therefore not normally part of the gas stream.  By having the probe at a point of turbulence these contaminates will be taken into the sample, giving a sample that is not representative. The design of the sample probe may vary with tips being beveled, 45°, shrouded, square cut or some other configuration.  Testing has been performed to determine whether these designs had any significant impact in the quality of the sample.  These tests have proven that shape had no impact, but the key is to have the probe in the center of the line in the correct spot (positive velocity/no turbulence) with a proper, full open valve on the outlet.  Field applications have shown that mounting the probe on the top of the pipeline is the preferred location.  Side or horizontal mounts can easily encourage free liquids (if present) to migrate into the sample system.

Valves  – If shut-off/isolation valves present a restriction that causes a pressure drop, it is possible that condensation could occur.  When used with a collection cylinder it is important that there are no leaks from the gland.  Light ends will be the first to leak off, thereby causing the sample to be overrepresented with heavy ends.  It is wise to use valves with soft seats to give a positive shut-off.  Large orifice valves should be used, as restrictive valve paths can cause fractionation of the sampled gas.  API 14.1 addresses these porting issues for valves used in the sampling process.

Relief Valves  –  Regulators should have a relief valve installed downstream, if the equipment downstream is not able to withstand full upstream pressure.  Regulators will not always give a guaranteed shut-off and their lock-up pressure will climb to a dangerous level should there be failure to attain a good shut-off caused by seat damage, diaphragm damage or impurity build-up on working parts and sensing lines.

Pipework  –  Tubing runs should be as short and as small a diameter as possible.  This will assist in minimizing the time delay from sample point to the analyzer or cylinder.  It will also help maintain the sample integrity.  When used with on-line analyzers, sample delivery lines should slope upward from the probe to the analyzer to prevent condensation and impurities entering the analyzer.  Lead lines to continuous samplers should slope back towards the pipeline.

Heating Elements – There is sufficient evidence to show that heating all components of a sampling system is a prudent step in having a reliable and accurate sampling system.  The hydrocarbon dew point of a natural gas stream is a critical issue in obtaining a representative gas sample.  API 14.1 spends considerable time on this issue of heating and hydrocarbon dew point, as does GPA 2166-05.

Sample Pump  –  These pumps are, of course, needed to extract the sample from the line and transfer the sample to the analyzer or collection cylinder.  They should have the capability to be able to extract the sample under flowing conditions, maintain a consistent discrete size of sample, take a fresh purged sample every time and have the ability to be controlled by a timer or proportional-to-flow controller.  This forms the heart of the continuous gas sampling system.  If the pump or sampler is unable to perform all these functions, a representative sample will not be taken, and the sampling exercise will be flawed.

Pumps can be either pneumatic or electric.  The safety requirements of the electrical components such as motors and solenoid valves and the environmental protection rating, dictate careful selection and compliance with applicable codes.  The selection options may well be limited if electrical components have requirements which are incompatible with the use of standard components elsewhere in the system.

Sample Cylinders  –  Sample cylinders are used for the collection of gases  and light liquid hydrocarbons and are sometimes called "sample bombs".  The cylinders come in three forms;   (1) One is a plain single cavity cylinder with a valve at each end.  This is the most common cylinder and also known as a spun cylinder or simply as a standard cylinder.  The hook up and operation of this cylinder is very straightforward.  (2) One is known as a Constant Pressure sample cylinder, which takes the form of a closed end cylinder with an internal piston.  Before using the Constant Pressure cylinder, one side is pressurized forcing the piston to the sample end.  When the sample is taken, the product is then collected and stored at whatever pressure is pre-charged at the back of the piston.  Using the Constant Pressure Cylinder, the sample can be collected at a pressure above the vapor pressure of the light ends.  By having the piston at the end of the cylinder, the need for excessive purging is eliminated.  Pulling a vacuum in the sample cylinder (which is often destroyed by technicians) or using the water outage method is not necessary.  It can be guaranteed that the sample taken is composed entirely of the gas being sampled.  The hook-up is simple and straightforward making the operation easier for technicians and minimizing the possibility of a non-representative sample being taken.  (3) A third cylinder design available today, is a single cavity cylinder with an internal, replaceable/disposable bladder or liner.  While it is relatively new to the industry, it is being used in several research programs as a third method and to establish data on its performance and results.  The bag starts at zero pressure and zero volume with a slight back pressure (Helium or other inert gas) introduced to collapse the bag completely, thus eliminating the need to purge the cylinder cavity.  After each use, the internal bag is removed and discarded, eliminating the need to clean the cylinder.  The hook-up and operation is simple and straightforward.

Sample cylinders are normally protected with bursting discs.  They are less expensive and are lighter weight than relief valves, though their proper selection and replacement should have more importance than is sometimes given them.  See the manufacturer’s guidelines for the burst discs provided with their equipment.

It is normally reasonably safe to use 316 stainless steel and Viton elastomeric components. With all of the notes on the various components, should go the comment which is one of the basic rules of sampling:  The materials of construction of the sampling equipment that come into contact with the sample are to be compatible with the product being sampled.  One should look for these materials in selecting equipment and ask questions of suppliers about material selections.  .  For instance, H2S can be absorbed into the structure of 316 stainless steel.  This will necessitate coating the inside of the cylinder.  The resultant sample will not be truly representative otherwise.

Regulators  –  On-line analysis should use regulators to reduce the pressure to the analyzer.  They will reduce the gas volume to the sampler, thus minimizing the time delay between the sample point via the regulator, to the analyzer.  This will lessen any negative effect on the gas sample by ambient conditions.

Insertion type regulators are preferable as they will be able to reduce the sample pressure in the flowing stream enabling a minimization of the Joule-Thompson effect created by the pressure drop.  The ambient temperature of the pipeline gas is transmitted via thermal fins, to offset the cooling effect.  The design purpose of the probe regulator is to not create liquids where liquids do not exist.  They were designed for rich, dry gas systems.  All aspects of the regulator systems should consider Hydrocarbon Dew Point impact on the process and be temperature conditioned to prevent those issues as much as possible.  Not all installations will require attention, but the ones which don’t now days, will be few and far between.  Wet gas systems present a new sampling challenge.

Filters  –  For on-line analyzers, it is sensible to install a filter.  Proper selection of the filter flow capacity and the particle size capacity should be encouraged.  A filter that is too small or does not have a sufficient drip pot capacity for gases that have entrained water is a recipe for high maintenance and off-spec analysis.  It is prudent to invest in a reasonable filter.  Proper selection of the filter flow capacity and the particle size capacity should be encouraged.  A filter that is too small or does not have a sufficient drip pot capacity for gases that have entrained water, is sure to result in the taking of a bad sample.  The use of a filter in spot sampling procedures and composite sampling systems is rare and should be done with extreme caution.

The sample point should be located in a section of the pipeline that always has a positive velocity, a minimum of turbulence, and the tap mounted on the top portion of the pipe.  If this simple guideline is followed, it will effectively eliminate meter manifolds, blow down stacks, standby runs, pig traps, headers of all types, drips, or any type of dead-end line.

Also, samples should never be taken around or too close to obstructions, control valves, orifice plates, elbows, tees, or other fittings that might generate aerosols.  Free liquids (aerosols) in the stream that may move into the sample cylinder cannot be effectively handled using standard cylinders and conventional methods; however, they may be handled by sampling into the constant pressure cylinder.

As well as choosing the correct equipment for the task, an additional major factor in correct sampling procedures is an awareness of the hydrocarbon dew point of the gas stream being sampled.  The importance of knowing the HCDP is related to 1). ambient temperature; 2). temperature of the equipment being used to collect the sample; and 3). temperature of the flowing stream.  The creation of liquids due to equipment design and equipment temperature must be avoided.  Determination of the HCDP of the gas stream can be done by the chilled mirror method or by the use of a number of equations of state models for hydrocarbon dew point determination.  There are several programs available such as Peng-Robinson or SRK.  The variations of the calculated results between different equations of state are so wide, that it is strongly recommended to add 20° to 50°F (11° to 28°C) to the answers.  This is to assure the operator that he is designing his sampling system temperature requirements above the actual hydrocarbon dew point.

While there are several methods for spot sampling natural gas,  three  common methods in use today are the fill and empty method, the piston cylinder method, and the Helium “Pop” method detailed in API 14.1/GPA-2166 (2022)-

Spot sampling was the primary method of acquiring a sample for analysis until the early 1970's.  This method is still widely used today.  In today's world of growing trends toward therm-measurement and therm-billing, this method is increasingly expensive in analytical cost and man-hours, as well as a very questionable method of assessing an accurate heating value to volume sales.  It is at best a "spot" sample of what was present at the moment the sample was taken.  Minutes before and minutes after, become unknown guesses.  While this may be a reasonable risk if the gas source is known by a long historical data base, most gas being consumed today is a combined gas from several origins or is switched from source to source by contractual updates, in some cases by daily or even hourly arrangements.   This author has been on location and witnessed a 62 BTU increase at a single sample point, within a one-hour time frame.  It was mainly attributed to both a substantial increase and decrease in flow rate as well as well selection changes within the gathering grid.  Also, we find typically, that the older the well and the longer it stays in production, the higher the BTU value will become.  Natural gas is an extremely fragile product and almost every step in the production, transportation and distribution of natural gas will have an impact on gas quality.   Switching wells, pressure changes, temperature changes and storage vessels are only a few of the items that can add or subtract BTU values on the gas moving through measurement stations.  Thus, a spot sample may not even represent the correct source in question.

In early years, the spot sampling method was used whereby the gas was introduced into the cylinder until it reached line pressure and then was transported to the laboratory for calorimeter or chromatograph analysis.  As the known quality of the gas (BTU value) became more important, tests were conducted to determine if the gas was being altered by the procedure used to fill cylinders.   It was determined that contaminates such as air were being introduced to the collected sample and a new filling method was needed.  The fill and purge method was adopted and after sometime it was determined that retrograde condensation was occurring by this process and thus a newer method was created. This newer method is known as the GPA method using a manifold and pig tail for filling the Standard Cylinder.  This GPA method reduced the negative effects of the "filling only" procedure.  The manifold allows gas   to be "trapped" in the cylinder at full pressure, rather than simply "dead ended" into the cylinder, i.e., zero pressure up to line pressure.  Also, systems with free liquids required special attention and the GPA separator was developed and added to certain techniques. 

As the quality of gas became a critical part of billing, along with volume (std. cu. m. or std cu. ft.), the industry again reviewed the Standard Cylinder and its accuracy.

The need for maintaining the gas at full line pressure from beginning to end became evident.  Any reduction in pressure and change in temperature from the line condition at the time of sample was deemed to alter the gas analysis in almost every case.  Only low BTU gas (975 BTU and below) seemed to possibly escape alteration.

It became evident that when the Standard Cylinder was being filled, the heavy ends dropped out as condensate in the cylinder until higher pressures were reached in the filling process.  The GPA method helped eliminate this problem.  But when the cylinder was being bled into the chromatograph, there was no way to keep the pressure elevated in that cylinder.  As the cylinder was opened, the light ends escaped first, thus giving a certain BTU value.  As the analysis continued, the BTU value increased due to the heavy ends remaining in the cylinder, thus altering the BTU value in a higher direction.  As it is normal that more than one test is performed due to concerns of accuracy or custody transfer, repeatability was more often than not, impossible.  It became clear that the decrease in pressure was altering the gas composition.

It was in this environment that the Constant Pressure cylinder was designed and created.  With an internal piston with seals, it was possible to pressurize (pre-charge) the cylinder with an inert gas supply (or the pipeline gas itself) and then turn the cylinder around and fill it slowly from the opposite end.  By letting the gas push against the piston while "slowly" venting the pre-charge gas, the sample was taken at full line pressure from start to finish.  Then, in the laboratory, a gas supply could be connected to the pre-charge side equal to the pipeline pressure.  As the sampled gas is injected into the chromatograph, the piston is being pushed by the pre-charge gas.  While the cylinder is being emptied, full pressure is being maintained and the gas composition is not being altered as a result of pressure reduction.  The cylinder can be stored or sent to another laboratory for confirmation, and when the remaining gas is analyzed, it will give repeatable results because the condition of the gas is maintained by the constant pressure cylinder.  The temperature is maintained just as with Standard Cylinders, i.e. heating blankets, ovens, or water baths.  The cylinder is equipped with valves, safety reliefs and gauges on both ends, and thus the pressure can be controlled and monitored at all times on both ends. 

This procedure has proven to give extreme accuracy in both spot sampling procedures as well as in automatic sampling systems.  The Constant Pressure Cylinder has been tested against the laboratory chromatograph and on-line chromatographs and has shown to maintain the integrity of the sample to within 1/2 BTU of the pipeline gas.  This method consistently performs at this high level.  Also, the richer the gas, the more alteration occurs with older methods.  Because of this high level of preserving the sample, the cylinders are now used as calibration standard cylinders.  That demand of maintaining accuracy is critical and gives the piston cylinder a solid recommendation for integrity.

The Constant Pressure Cylinder also brings with it, additional safety in handling the sample.  No longer do you have to purge the cylinder and vent large amounts of gas to the atmosphere.  A brief purge of the sample line up to the cylinder is all that is required.  The piston is at the sample end of the cylinder when you commence to fill, so there is no "dead volume" to purge.

Also, because of the design of the cylinder, with seals on the end of caps, it cannot be over pressured to the point of exploding, rupturing or fragmenting.  If the cylinder is over pressured, the safety reliefs will allow the pressure to escape.  In the rare event that they fail to work the cylinder body will swell and the seals will stop sealing, allowing the product to escape safely.

Constant Pressure Cylinders have served the industry for 50+ years to provide accurate sampling procedures, better sampling systems, repeatability, safer handling, accurate analysis and storage of samples as well as storage of gas and liquid calibration standards for the laboratory.  All updated ISO, API/GPA standards and committee reports, address the proper usage of Standard and Constant Pressure Cylinders for the gas and liquids industry.

Because of the increasing cost of one BTU, more and more companies are improving their methods, and departing from older spot sampling practices.

Composite sampling is the proven middle ground between spot sampling and the continuous on-line analytical gas chromatographs.

Composite or Grab sampling is the collection of the natural gas from the pipeline by means of a timed or proportional-to-flow sampler.

A composite gas sampler or gas sampling system consists of a probe, a sample collection pump, an instrumentation supply system, a timing system and a collection cylinder for sample transportation. Its sole objective is to collect and store a representative composite sample at line conditions, allowing it to be transported to the laboratory for repeatable analysis.

This package will mount on a pipeline and collect samples over a desired sample period unattended.  For the sake of illustration, a description of a common system is provided here.

An engineered probe should be installed which extends into the middle 1/3 of the flowing stream.  There is relief in API 14.1/GPA-2166 (2022) for large diameter piping, but the accepted norm is the center 1/3 of the pipeline.  This location should be chosen to provide a representative sample of the gas stream, thus devoid of stagnant gas, i.e., blow down stack, and devoid of free liquids and aerosols, i.e. downstream of piping elbows or orifice fittings which cause turbulent flow.  The probe should have a large-ported outlet valve to prevent fractionation, resulting in compositional changes in the gas.

A self-purging sample collection pump designed to operate under line conditions should be located above and as close to the probe as is practical and possible.  Filters, drip pots, screens, regulators and such conditioning equipment shall not be placed between the probe and the sampler, as this will affect the representative nature of the sample which is taken.  Inlet check valves can also cause the gas to fractionate, due to the restriction it causes in the line.  The instrumentation source for the sampler can be from the pipeline itself (the most common installation) or from an auxiliary instrument supply.

The timing system can be a simple function timer and solenoid, a proportional-to-flow signal conditioner and solenoid, or simply, a solenoid ready to be connected to field RTU's or other electronic devices capable of providing the desired signal.

The sample collection cylinder can be either a conventional single cavity sample cylinder or the more contemporary piston style, constant pressure sample cylinder.  As these cylinders will be transported, they should meet design criteria such as ASME Section 8 or carry approvals from recognized agencies such as D.O.T., DNV, Lloyds, etc.   A typical system would include a 500ml cylinder which would be used on a monthly basis to contain 2200+ bites of .2 cc size during the sample period. 

Using the grab sampler, it is possible to obtain a representative sample over a pre-determined period.  It is the only practical method for collecting a continuous sample.  The grab sampler will introduce a set volume taken in equal amounts, to the collection cylinder over a set period and is the preferred method when a representative sample has to be taken over time.  It has the advantage of being able to measure precisely a predictable amount over a given period when using a timer and can also take samples proportional-to-flow when taking a modified signal from a flow meter.

In addition, the sample is taken from the flowing stream at the system pressure and can be pumped into the sample cylinder at the flowing pressure; thus, any change in composition is avoided.  Another feature desired of any sampler is that it should not have areas or pockets where residue of previous samples can accumulate and, must take a fresh grab or bite of gas each time it samples.

This then describes a typical continuous composite sampling system, which has been proven to provide a representative sample for analysis.  Such systems have been tested against continuous on-line gas calorimeters and gas chromatographs with + 1 BTU accuracy for the total sample period, at considerably less cost and maintenance than on-line GC's.

And finally, in the realm of gas sampling there are the continuous on-line analytical units, the calorimeter and the chromatograph.  These units have their place in the past, the present and will continue to have an important place in the future of gas sampling.  It is their cost, power requirements and typical up keep that precludes their use in 1000's of locations.  On-line analysis is convenient, although it is dependent on the accuracy of the analyzer, its correct calibration and the quality of the sample reaching it.  It tends to be expensive to install and maintain.  Economics, remote location, and downtime for service dictate the use of spot or composite sampling techniques at a majority of sample points and installations.  It is also important to point out that with on-line units there is no second or third chance at analysis, and no second opinion option, as is the case with a sample in a sample cylinder.

There are a number of sources available regarding the installation and set-up of online GC’s and the reader should take advantage of those resources.  Sample conditioning systems should be carefully chosen to make sure that the GC sees a truly representative sample stream of the flowing gas in the pipeline.  Some installations will simply require a probe regulator to reduce the pressure and deliver that stream to the GC.  Other locations may require additional heat to keep the sample stream at or above the HCDP of the source gas.

Energy meters, while relatively new, are being introduced as an on-line, instant BTU meter.  They will not provide analysis in the manner of the existing GC’s, but they will provide immediate BTU values.  This technology can fill a current void in real-time billing and plant operations.  Their value is in reduced costs compared to on-line GC’s, reduced maintenance and calibration costs, and in providing real-time information for operations.

The transportation of natural gas samples is a very important issue for both the companies that are involved and the individual personnel who are transporting the samples.  The United States Department of Transportation (DOT) covers the transportation of samples in CFR-49.  Everyone involved in transporting sample cylinders and other sampling apparatus, both to and from sample collection locations, should be familiar with the rules and regulations set forth in CFR-49.

As well as the safety issues, markings and forms that are to be filled out for DOT purposes, other considerations should be addressed as well.  Among these are:

• Proper tagging of the cylinder for time, date, location of the sample
• Pressure and temperature of the pipeline source
• Technician who took the sample
• Method used to obtain the sample
• Plugging of the valves and checking for leaks prior to transport
• Protection of the cylinder and sample apparatus during transport, both to and from the sample      location
• Temperature concerns during transport, both to and from the sample location – if necessary or required
• Other company procedures that will assist in the success of a quality sample being delivered to the laboratory for an accurate analysis

The methods, techniques, and designs of today's sampling systems should be considered by every producer, shipper, buyer and end-user.  Regardless of the application or installation, there is a system which meets your needs, and will affect your company in the profit and loss column.  Sampling and metering are the cash register of your company. Sampling is an art!  Examine your methods, procedures and needs closely.

“A Case for and an Update to Research and Testing on the Issue of Hydrocarbon Wet Gas Sampling”, D. J. Fish, Presented at

Natural Gas Sampling Technology Conference, NGSTech 2014, January 22, 2014, New Orleans, Louisiana

"Proper Sampling of Light Hydrocarbons", O. Broussard, Oil and Gas Journal, September 1977

"Standard Cylinder vs. Constant Pressure Cylinders", D. J. Fish, Gas Industries, January 1994

"Analyzing Heating Value", T. F. Welker, Pipe Line Industry, October 1990

"Natural Gas Sampling", T. F. Welker, Presented at AGA Annual Meeting, Anaheim, California, 1981

“The Importance of Discerning the Impact of New Measurement Technology”, D. J. Fish, Presented as Keynote Address, 25th Annual North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop, Oslo, Norway, October 2007

“Reducing Measurement Uncertainty in Process Gas Quality Measurements”, Dr. Darin George, Presented at International School of Hydrocarbon Measurement,  Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 2007

"Methods, Equipment & Installation of Composite Hydrocarbon Sampling Systems", D. J. Fish, Presented at Belgian Institute for Regulation and Automation, Brussels, Belgium, 1993

“Practical Considerations of Gas Sampling and Gas Sampling Systems”, D. J. Fish, Pipeline and Gas Journal, July 1997

“Natural Gas Sampling Uncertainties and Economics”, David Wofford, International School of Hydrocarbon Measurement, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 2002

"Selection and Installation of Hydrocarbon Sampling Systems", D. A. Dobbs & D. J. Fish, Presented at Australian International Oil & Gas Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 1991

Various Standards of AGA, GPA, API, ASTM and ISO

The author acknowledges the contributions made to this paper that also came from members of API, ASTM, GPA, AGA, and ISO with whom he has worked over the years.

Several site visits related to research conducted within the industry for improved gas sampling procedures.

G.P.A. FILL AND EMPTY METHOD
TYPICAL RECOMMENDED MANIFOLD HOOK-UP

I.   Sample Probe

II.    Sample Pressure Gauge (same as line pressure)

Steps to follow to draw sample:

1. Open Valve 'I' to blow any accumulated foreign matter in probe or valve.
2. Connect manifold to probe Valve 'I' (close Valve 'I').
3. Open Valves 'A', 'B', 'D', 'E', and 'F'.  Valves 'C' and 'G' remain closed.
4. Open Valve 'I' to allow full pipeline pressure to fill complete manifold.
5. Close Valve 'A' and open Valve 'G' to allow gas in the manifold to bleed to 0 psig.
6. Close Valve 'G' and open Valve 'A' to allow pressure to build rapidly to full line pressure.
   NOTE:  Steps 4 through 6 should be repeated until all air has been eliminated from the system (3 to 5 times).
7. Open Valve 'A' quickly to fill manifold with full pipe­line pressure.  Close Valve 'A'.
8. Open extension Valve 'G'. Allow pressure to bleed to 0 psig.  Close Valve 'G'.
   NOTE:  If at any time liquids appear at Valve 'G', the sample should be discarded.
   NOTE:  Steps 7 and 8 constitute the fill and empty cycle and should be repeated as many times as required by your pipe­line pressure and the chart below. Table 1 gives the mini­mum number of purges required to condition your sample cylinder (providing the sample cylinder is clean and dry).
   
   

   Maximum Gas Pressure PSIG	Number of Purge Cycles
   15–30	13
   30–60	8
   60–90	6
   90–150	5
   150–500	4
   Over 500	3

9. At the completion of the proper number of purge cycles, close Valves 'E', 'F', and probe Valve 'I'. Bleed the pressure from the manifold and extension tube. Remove the sample cylinder from the manifold and check for leaks. Plug the valves. Fill out the proper sample tag and put the cylinder in a proper carrying case to be transported to the lab.

G.P.A. CONTINUOUS PURGE METHOD
TYPICAL MANIFOLD HOOK-UP

Caution: This method should not be used on wet natural gas or gas over 400 psi.

I.   Sample Probe

II.  Sample Pressure Gauge (same as line pressure)

Steps to follow to draw sample: 

1. Open Valve 'I' to blow out any accumulated foreign matter in probe or valve (close Valve 'I').
2. Connect sample manifold to probe Valve 'I'. All valves closed.
3. Slowly open Valve 'I', and then slowly open in sequence Valves 'A', 'B', 'D', 'E', 'F', and 'G'.
   NOTE:  Valve 'G' must have flow plug installed.
4. Allow gas to flow through the manifold for a minimum of 3 minutes.
   NOTE:  That more time will be required if the sample cylinder has not been properly cleaned and dried.
   NOTE:  G.P.A. method should be consulted for unusual conditions.
5. After specified time, valves should be closed beginning with Valve 'G' and working toward the source valve, sequence 'G', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'B', 'A', and 'I'.
6. Bleed pressure from manifold and remove sample cylinder.
7. Check cylinder for leaks and plug valves.
8. Fill out sample card and put cylinders in proper box for shipment.

G.P.A. CONTINUOUS PURGE METHOD
TYPICAL MANIFOLD HOOK-UP

1. Evacuate a clean sample cylinder and plug valves.
2. Open probe Valve 'I' to clean valve and probe of accumu­lated materials.
3. Connect manifold to probe Valve 'I'.
4. With all valves closed, attach sample cylinder to mani­fold.
   NOTE:  Check with a gauge to ensure sample cylinder is evacuated.
5. Open probe Valve 'I', 'A', and 'B'.  All other valves closed.
   NOTE:  Sample gauge II will indicate pipeline pressure.
6. Close Valve 'A'.
7. Open Valve 'G' on the extension tube.
   NOTE:  This will bleed manifold pressure to 0 psi.
   NOTE:  Steps 6 and 7 constitute a purge of the piping to the evacuated cylinder. This should be repeated as required by your pipeline pressure to ensure any air in the lines has been purged with gas.
8. Open Valve 'A' with Valve 'B' open, slowly open Valve 'D' and allow line pressure to fill sample cylinder.
9. Close Valve 'D'.  Close Valve 'I'. Open Valve 'G' to remove pressure from the sample manifold.
10. Remove sample cylinder from manifold. Check for leaks, plug valves, fill out sample information, and put cylinder in an appropriate case for transportation.

DRAWING A SPOT SAMPLE INTO A CONSTANT PRESSURE
(SLIDING PISTON) SAMPLE CYLINDER

To draw a spot sample into a constant pressure sample cylinder, the following procedure should be used.

Prior to going to the field, check these items:

1. Has the cylinder been emptied, cleaned, and checked for leaks?
2. Attach to the precharge Valve 'G', a supply of inert gas (N2), with Valve 'B' open, and fill the cylinder to 100 psi above line pressure.  Close Valves 'G' and 'B'.
3. Put the cylinder in a carrying case with the proper transport papers, and go to the field.

At the sample point:

1. With an appropriate connector, connect Valve 'B' on the cylinder to the process connection 'I' (sample probe).
2. Valves 'I', 'A', 'B', and purge valve are closed.
3. Open Valve 'I'. Check the connections for leaks.
4. Open Valve 'B'. This allows product to flow into the cylinder to the face of the piston.
5. Purge: Close Valve 'I' with 'B' open, open 'A' (slowly). Bleed off the product in the cylinder.
6. Close Valve 'A'.
7. Open Valve 'I'.
8. Close Valve 'I'.
9. Open Valve 'A' (slowly).
10. Close 'A'.
    NOTE:  By opening 'I' and 'A', you fill and empty the piping and cylinder to eliminate air or contaminants. If the pressure is above 500 psi, 3 to 5 purges will be adequate.  Do not flow through with all valves open.  This may cause retrograde condensation to occur.

To draw the sample after the purge:

1. Open Valve 'I'.
2. Open Valve 'B'.  Valve 'A' remains closed.  Product is now against the face of the piston.
3. Slowly open Valve 'G'.  Bleeding off the precharge from the back side of the piston will allow the process pressure to fill the sample container.
4. When the indicator reaches 80%, close Valve 'G'.  You now have 80% product, 20% precharge, and the cylinder may be transported.

To disconnect the cylinder from the process:

1. Close Valve 'I' (probe valve) and Valve 'B'.
2. Slowly open Valve 'A' to remove the pressure between the purge valve and cylinder inlet valve 'B'.
3. Remove connection at Valve 'B', plug all the valves, fill out the paperwork, and put the cylinder in a carrying case for transportation.

TYPICAL SAMPLE HOOK-UP OF CYLINDER

Note: Not recommended.

Sample taken by simply viewing into a convenient valve is not a proper means by which to take a representative sample of any type.